Still, the correlation doesnt make any sense, even with Brandon Sklenars explanation.
After Alexs death, Spencer goes directly to Whitfields mansion with Jacob.
Killing the man attacking his family made sense, butSpencers reasoning for killing Whitfield did not track.
Spencer and Jacob proceed to storm the mining tycoons lavish mansion.
Teonna Rainwater endures horrible circumstances throughout 1923, leading to her bittersweet season 2 finale conclusion.
When he asks Alexs name, further questioning the war heros attack,Spencer shoots Whitfield in cold blood.
Custom Image by Yailin Chacon
Still, while Spencer has a plethora of reasons to blame Whitfield, Alexs death isnt among them.
They felt that people would feel that and understand why without having to spell it out.
He went through the chain of events as far as why he feels that Whitfield is responsible.
1923 is a series following the Dutton family during the early twentieth century. It explores the challenges they face amidst pandemics, the end of Prohibition, historic drought, and the Great Depression, as they struggle to maintain their home in the mountain west.
None of this would have happened had Whitfield not come after the Dutton family.
Alex would not have followed Spencer home, and she would not have gotten stranded in the snow.
So it is his fault.
Brandon Sklenar explained thatSpencer blamed Whitfield because the tycoon came after his family.
While Sklenar is right that the war brought him home, hes wrong about a pivotal detail.
Banner asks Whitfield for an army, involving Donald, after the initial attack.
By the time Banner goes to Donald in1923season 1, episode 4, Spencers brother is already dead.
While Whitfield wasnt responsible forAlexandra of Sussex’s fate, he indeed caused Spencers family strife.
Instead, Sklenars explanation further muddles1923s inconsistency, ruling out more vague interpretations.
