Even before the start of this trilogy, Larrain was no stranger tohistorical films.
Just before he began his 20th century women trilogy, Larrain directed a biopic about Pablo Neruda.
Thus, the filmmaker has a specific niche.
Notably, there are many places in which these movies intertwine and diverge.
On the other hand, all three women suffered from massive public tragedies at different points in their lives.
Ultimately, Larrain’s trilogy is incredibly effective, and deserves to be analyzed further.
Among Larrain’s three biopics, these are unfortunately the lowest scores.
It is true thatMaria’sfocus on Callas' last days makes it stand apart from more traditional biopics.
Unfortunately, the greatest strength ofMariamay also be its biggest downfall.
This does not make or breakMaria,but it does set the movie below Larrain’s other biopics.
Similar toMaria,Spencershowcases split scores among critics and audiences on Rotten Tomatoes.
Once again,lead actress Kristen Stewartalso earned heaps of compliments for fully embodying the beloved Princess of Wales.
Spenceris another example of Larrain’s filmmaking landing with some and missing the target for others.
Furthermore, audiences did not connect with the movie nearly as much as critics did.
The metaphors and symbolism were also a problem for audiences.
Thus,Spenceris Larrain’s most controversial project of the trilogy.
In typical Larrain fashion,Jackiepulls no punches when it comes to the vulnerability of his main character.
Maria shows the singer’s romance with Aristotle Onassis and her silent feud with his wife Jackie Kennedy.
This is their connection and feud explained.
The grief Jackie carries is universal, and her reactions speak to countless viewers.
Of course,Jackieis not a perfect movie, and the film’s audience score reflects that.
Many viewers were disappointed by the film because of its slow pace.
Arguably, this movie is not for everyone.
